The decision to place an amalgamation question on the 2026 Victoria and Saanich municipal ballot is a pivotal moment for our communities. As a Saanich councillor, I advocate for a referendum question that is unbiased, transparent, and free of recommendations. Our citizens deserve to make an informed choice based on clear data about taxes, affordability, livability, and sustainability – not a predetermined push toward amalgamation.
The Victoria-Saanich Citizens’ Assembly, chaired by Peter McLeod, worked diligently for eight months, with 39 of 46 members endorsing amalgamation. While I respect their efforts, and appreciate their call to civic duty, I believe the assembly’s pro-amalgamation recommendation presupposes an outcome. A neutral report, detailing both benefits and risks, would better serve voters. The referendum question must avoid any bias to ensure a fair decision.
Saanich’s identity is tied to its rural lands, which make up 50% of our municipality. These soils, trees, and urban canopy are priceless assets for climate adaptation, carbon sequestration and food security.
Amalgamation could threaten our urban containment boundary, a mechanism used to protect these lands, and open the door to development that prioritizes corporate profits over ecological integrity. We cannot reduce these ecosystems to mere real estate value, as some might propose.
Equally critical is meaningful consultation with the Lekwungen and WSANEC peoples. An invitation to participate is not enough; we must ensure their voices shape this process. Have we considered whether amalgamation respects their connection to these lands?
Proponents argue amalgamation could amplify our regional voice, potentially securing more provincial and federal funding. But at what cost, loss of rural lands? The assembly’s report lacked specifics on financial impacts, including how a merger might affect Victoria’s financial reserves or Saanich’s borrowing practices. Without transparent data on taxes and service delivery, voters cannot make an informed choice.
I support integrating services like police and fire (which does not require amalgamation and is already happening to a large degree), as well as reviewing council and staff remuneration, and challenging provincial downloading of costs. These steps, instead of amalgamation, can enhance efficiency without sacrificing Saanich’s unique character. As we approach the Oct. 17, 2026 election, the referendum question must be neutral, grounded in facts, and respectful of our natural and cultural heritage.
Let’s thank the assembly for their work, but ensure the question empowers citizens to decide for themselves.
Nathalie Chambers
Saanich councillor
